SAMSUNG Reasoning Question

DIRECTIONS for questions 1-5 : Attempt the question based on the information given.
  1. A few friends are sitting on a bench.
  2. Sunil is sitting next to Sunita and Sanjay is sitting next to Bindu.
  3. Bindu is not sitting with Sumit.
  4. Sumit is on the left end of the bench and Sanjay is on second position from right hand side.
  5. Sunil is on the right side of Sumit and Sunita.
  6. Sunil and Sanjay are sitting together.
  1. Sunil is sitting between
    1. Sunita and Bindu
    2. Sunita and Sanjay
    3. Sumit and Bindu
    4. Sanjay and Sumit
    Answer: Option B.
    After taking into consideration all the condition given, their order of seating is -
    Sumit Sunita Sunil Sanjay Bindu.
    It can be seen that Sunil is sitting betwen Sunita and Sanjay.
  2. Who is sitting in the center?
    1. Sumit
    2. Bindu
    3. Sunil
    4. Sanjay
    Answer:  Option C.
    After taking into consideration all the condition given, their order of seating is -
    Sumit Sunita Sunil Sanjay Bindu.
    Sunil sits in the between.
  1. Sumit is sitting on the
    1. second place from right
    2. extreme left
    3. second place from left
    4. extreme right
    Answer: Option B.
    After taking into consideration all the condition given, their order of seating is -
    Sumit Sunita Sunil Sanjay Bindu.
    Sumit is sitting on the extreme left.
  2. Bindu is sitting on the
    1. extreme left side
    2. second from left side
    3. extreme right side
    4. third from left side
    Answer: Option C.
    After taking into consideration all the condition given, their order of seating is -
    Sumit Sunita Sunil Sanjay Bindu.
    Bindu is sitting in extreme right position.
  3. Sunita is sitting how many places away from Bindu?
    1. 1
    2. 4
    3. 2
    4. 5
    Answer: Option C.
    After taking into consideration all the condition given, their order of seating is -
    Sumit Sunita Sunil Sanjay Bindu.
    Sunita is sitting two places away from Bindu.
    DIRECTIONS for questions 6-9 : Study the information below to answer the question.
    1. Seeta, Rajinder and Surinder are children of Mr. and Mrs. Aggarwal.
    2. Renu, Raja and Sunil are children of Mrs. and Mr. Malhotra.
    3. Sunil and Seeta are a married couple and Ashok and Sanjay are their children.
    4. Geeta and Rakesh are children of Mr. and Mrs.Gupta.
    5. Geeta is married to Surinder and has three children named Rita, Sonu and Raju.
  4. How is Rajinder related to Ashok?
    1. Father-in-law
    2. Brother-in-law
    3. Cousin
    4. Maternal Uncle
    Answer: Option D.

    As shown above, Rajinder is Maternal Uncle of Ashok.
  5. What is Sanjay's surname?
    1. Gupta
    2. Malhotra
    3. Aggarwal
    4. Surinder
    Answer: Option B.

    Surname of any person is same as of his father and father of Sanjay is Sunil, who is son of Malhotra, so surname of Sanjay is also Malhotra.
  6. Renu is Sanjay's___________
    1. Sister-in-law
    2. Sister
    3. Cousin
    4. Aunty
    Answer: Option D.

    Renu is Sunil’s sister and Sanjay is son of Sunil, so Renu is Sanjay’s aunty.

    DIRECTIONS for questions 9-10 : The question has a statement followed by two conclusions I and II. Consider the statement and the following conclusions.
    Decide which of the conclusions follows from the statement. Mark answer as.
    1) If conclusion I follows.
    2) If conclusion II follows.
    3) If either conclusion I or II follows.
    4) If neither conclusion I nor II follows.

  7. Statement:
    I.I know nothing except the fact of my ignorance.
    Conclusions:
    I.Writer's knowledge is very poor.
    II.The world of knowledge is too vast to be explored by a single person.
    1. 1
    2. 2
    3. 3
    4. 4
    Answer: Option B.
    The given statement is a little philosophical and it means that ‘more you learn/know, more you become aware of your ignorance’ and also you come to know the vast repository of knowledge in this world. Also you come to know about vast repository of knowledge in this world. Hence statement II can be inferred from the given statement. "Statement I’ is way out of track and cannot be concluded on the basis of the given statement.
  8. Statement:
    I. Quality has a price tag. India is allocating lots of funds to education.
    Conclusions:
    I. Quality of education in India would improve soon.
    II. Funding alone can enhance quality of education.
    1. 1
    2. 2
    3. 3
    4. 4
    Answer: Option A.
    Statement I can be concluded as main statement says that in order to provide good education to the kids resources are required and arrange for the best infrastructure , teachers etc. money is required and if India is allocating funds for this very purpose, then the quality of education would improve soon. To conclude that ‘money’ alone can improve the quality of the education will be an overstatement. Hence, Option 1 is right.

Complete Campus Placement Training Course
Video LecturesOnline TestsE-Books & Assignments

Test Site